Direct Linking vs. Prelanders for mVas

[Niko]

Introduction
In the world of mVas, choosing between direct linking and using prelanders is a crucial decision that can significantly impact your campaign's success. This content brief will explore the pros and cons of each approach and provide guidance on how to implement them effectively.

​

The Pros and Cons of Direct Linking​

Pros of Direct Linking​

Direct linking is a straightforward approach that involves sending traffic directly to an offer or landing page without an intermediary page. Here are the advantages of this method:
Simplicity: Direct linking is easy to set up and doesn't require the creation of additional web pages.
Quick Setup: It can be implemented quickly, making it an ideal choice for time-sensitive campaigns.
Cost-Efficiency: With fewer steps involved, direct linking can reduce advertising costs as no hosting of your web pages is needed, and often times you can even skip tracker

Cons of Direct Linking​

However, direct linking is not without its drawbacks:
Limited Control: Marketers have limited control over the user experience, which can affect conversion rates.
Lower Quality Score: Ad networks often prefer prelanders, potentially leading to lower ad quality scores for direct linking campaigns.
Missing Profit Opportunities: By using direct linking, you are missing out on potential profits from implementing push subscriptions and extra traffic back options on your web pages. This can be vital in your campaigns as the profit of extra monetization is not to be underestimated

The Pros and Cons of Prelanders​

Pros of Prelanders​

Prelanders, also known as intermediary pages, offer several benefits:
Improved User Experience: Prelanders allow you to create a compelling and informative introduction to your offer, increasing user engagement.
Better Conversion Rates: A well-designed prelander can boost conversion rates by pre-qualifying visitors.
Ad Network Approval: Many ad networks prefer prelanders, making it easier to get campaigns approved.
Extra Monetization: You can implement push subscriptions or email opt-ins and extra traffic back options on your web pages such as a redirect on a back button, a timed redirect, or an extra popup windows after CTA

Cons of Prelanders​

On the flip side, pretenders have their share of disadvantages:
Complexity: Designing and optimizing prelanders can be time-consuming.
Additional Costs: Prelanders require an extra step, potentially increasing campaign expenses.

Which Approach is Better for mVas Offers?​

The choice between direct linking and using prelanders largely depends on your campaign objectives and your audience. Consider the following factors:
Offer Type: Some offers may work better with direct linking, while others benefit from prelander introductions.
Audience Knowledge: Assess how familiar your target audience is with your offer. Prelanders can be helpful for offers requiring explanation.
Conversion Goals: If your primary goal is high conversion rates, a well-designed prelander can make a significant difference.

Conclusion​

In the dynamic world of mVas, both direct linking and prelanders have their merits. The choice depends on your specific campaign objectives, audience, and the nature of your offer. To stay competitive, it's essential to adapt your approach and make data-driven decisions for optimal results.